Hockey Canada governance review calls for more oversight, accountability | CBC Sports


Hockey Canada finds itself “at a crossroads” that requires reimagined leadership coupled with more oversight and transparency, a third-party governance review has found.

The 221-page document released Friday following an independent probe led by former Supreme Court justice Thomas Cromwell comes at a crucial time for the scandal-plagued national sport organization on the heels of a disastrous spring, summer and fall.

CBC News previously reported on an interim version of the document.

That preliminary report revealed a controversial reserve fund that Hockey Canada publicly vowed it would stop using to settle sexual assault allegations is significantly depleted after the organization transferred millions of dollars in past years to another account.

Hockey Canada said last month that it accepts the former Supreme Court justice’s report and is reviewing the recommendations “with a view to implement them as soon as possible,” according to a statement on Oct. 13 by the organization.
The report also found serious problems with how the reserve fund was administered, including that Hockey Canada didn’t have policies and procedures in place to govern use of its reserve funds, didn’t fully disclose its funds in financial records, and broke the rules by failing to notify members of large payouts.

“This report demonstrates what we already knew: Hockey Canada has not been transparent for years,” Pascale St-Onge, the federal sport minister, said in a statement. “This shows serious governance failures that have been fostering a culture of silence. They treated the allegation of sexual violence as an insurance issue.

“Now, I am expecting that the new board make the necessary changes to create a healthy environment.”

Hockey Canada has been under intense pressure since May when it was revealed the federation quietly settled a lawsuit after a woman claimed she was sexually assaulted by eight players, including members of the country’s world junior team, following a 2018 gala in London, Ont.

The federal government and corporate sponsors quickly paused financial support, but the ugly headlines continued with the revelation of a secretive National Equity Fund — partly maintained by registration fees — used to pay for uninsured liabilities, including sexual assault and abuse claims.

“Confidence takes time to build, but can be quickly lost,” Cromwell wrote in his introduction. “Hockey Canada’s recent experience is testament to that.”

WATCH l Hockey Canada aim to improve selection of new board of directors:

Hockey Canada to implement bylaw changes following scandal

Hockey Canada and its members voted unanimously to bring in bylaw changes meant to improve how the organization selects a new board of directors as part of efforts to repair its broken reputation.

A Hockey Canada official testified to parliamentarians in July the organization had doled out $7.6 million in nine settlements related to sexual assault and abuse claims since 1989, not including this year’s payout.

Police in London later said the force would reopen the investigation into the 2018 incident. The NHL is also conducting an investigation because many of the players from the 2018 world junior team are now in the league.

Hockey Canada then announced members of the 2003 men’s world junior roster are being investigated for a group sexual assault, as calls for change at the top mounted.

None of the allegations have been proven in court.

Hockey Canada president and CEO Scott Smith resisted calls for his resignation, but left the organization Oct. 11, the same day the board of directors resigned in the wake of a stunning parliamentary hearing — the third time officials had been called to Ottawa since June — and the release of Cromwell’s interim governance review.

Cromwell’s full report recommends new parameters for the board’s nomination process, increasing its size from nine to 13 and ensuring that no more than 60 per cent of directors are of the same gender. A new election is set for next month.

“The complexity of the organization’s leadership challenges have outgrown the responsive capacity of the present board recruitment and election processes,” Cromwell wrote. “The current board nomination process has not provided Hockey Canada with the wide range, depth and diversity of experience, both professional and personal, that the board collectively requires to govern this complex organization and to lead significant cultural change.”

Cromwell, who recommended minutes be taken at all Hockey Canada meetings moving forward, added that roles of senior management and the board “are not clearly defined nor distinguished.”

“This, at times, leads to the board involving itself too deeply in day-to-day operations,” the report read. “Moreover, the reporting relationship, particularly regarding the transfer of key information, is informal and unstructured.”

Lack of transparency, appropriate oversight

Cromwell, who interviewed more than 80 people in over 60 meetings for the report, said Hockey Canada was right to establish reserve funds — including the National Equity Fund (NEF).

“The establishment of reserve funds to address the risk of uninsured and under-insured claims is not only sound, but the failure to do so would be a serious oversight.”

There was not, however, appropriate oversight or transparency

“Hockey Canada has no written policy governing the NEF.”

Cromwell’s recommends Hockey Canada provides “timely disclosure of publicly available information to its members regarding ongoing and potential claims.”

“Once a settlement is reached, we recommend that Hockey Canada disclose all publicly available information … while respecting the restrictions of any non-disclosure agreements in force,” the report read.

Hockey Canada says it has already taken action to implement recommendations outlined in last month’s interim report.

Cromwell also painted a murky picture of how organizations, associations, leagues, teams and participants with different resources and different regions operate.

“The responsibility for developing the sport of hockey in accordance with good governance principles lies with multiple parties,” the report read.

“A lack of clarity around organizational structure and authority can result in uncertainty.”

While the scope of the review was on governance, Cromwell noted a number of issues raised by stakeholders throughout the process, including hockey’s “toxic culture” and additional support for women’s and para hockey.

WATCH l Hockey Canada CEO, entire board of directors stepping aside:

Hockey Canada board, CEO resign amid widespread criticism

Hockey Canada has announced its CEO and entire board of directors are stepping aside after mounting backlash over its handling of sexual assault allegations.

Cromwell also said it’s time those same stakeholders “reflect on their own roles and responsibilities.”

“Some who have been quick to announce their loss of confidence in Hockey Canada have been slow to acknowledge their own past contributions to its troubles,” he wrote. “The underlying causes of the current crisis are not of recent origin. The members have controlled who is on the board. Sport Canada, as recently as June 2022, gave Hockey Canada a top rating for some aspects of governance.

“It is not my role to point fingers or assign responsibility. I will simply observe that many could have done more to address the issues sooner.”

Cromwell concluded that it’s his hope the governance recommendations help Hockey Canada make “urgently needed” change.

“All stakeholders will have to work together to bring these changes about,” he wrote.

“Hockey Canada is at a crossroads.”


Share this news on your Fb,Twitter and Whatsapp

File source

NY Press News:Latest News Headlines
NY Press News||Health||New York||USA News||Technology||World News

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button